The Lonely Polygamist

3 Responses to January

  1. Okay, guys, how’d you like it? I thought it was a solid read and so enter­taining. Of course I learned a lot about polygamy amongst the Mormons, but I was mostly blown away by Udall’s ability to see into the hearts of his male char­acters. He wasn’t bad with the females, either, but it was the
    men and boys that touched me the most.

    Somebody get online and tell me what the group thought. Did anyone comment on the length of the book? Or the fact that sex can be, and indeed often is, side-​​splittingly funny and breath-​​takingly sad, all at the same time?

  2. Renagrams says:

    Hope you’re feeling better, Sunny.  Missed you!  Most readers found Udall’s Polyg­amist a worth­while read even though dif­ficult to get into.  The dys­func­tional family was dis­cussed at length as well as the superbly developed char­acters.  Many readers dis­cussed Golden with his many quirks, espe­cially his clue­lessness and inability to take charge of his life.  Who wouldn’t like to take Rusty aside and give him some one-​​on-​​one attention and some new underwear!  I hope others will share more of  their insights with you./

    • Got my antibi­otics this morning and I think it may be helping. Boy, did I ever missing being there. Was there any dis­cussion about religion? Oh my gosh, so much of their “offer it up for your reward in heaven” reminded me so much of Catholicism of the 1940s and 1950s. So some of the story was a bit close for comfort.  I hope others chime in.

Leave a Reply